|
|
||
Updates: Pennsylvania CasesHarassment Of Raw Milk Farmers In Pennsylvania And New YorkA consistent pattern of harassment against raw milk farmers is emerging in Pennsylvania and New York. Since April, a total of nine farmers have been told that their milk tested positive for Listeria monocytogenes. The positive tests appear to coincide with the FDA’s issuance in March of a Powerpoint presentation on the “dangers of raw milk.” There are no reports of anyone getting sick from drinking the milk of any of these nine farms. Please note that the generic bacteria listeria are ubiquitous and not harmful, although its presence in milk is considered a red flag. Only one strain, Listeria monocytogenes (L-mono), is considered pathogenic. The standard protocol is to test milk for listeria and, if the test is positive, to then test for the specific bacteria Listeria monocytogenes, a process that takes five days or more. According to a lab technician employed by Mosely Laboratories in Indianapolis, which uses the standard protocol for detecting L-mono, results are 100 percent accurate. The technician stated that of the fifty tests on raw milk that he has run for L-mono over the past two years, not a single one has been positive. PENNSYLVANIA The Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture is using a new testing system, called Vidas 30, which it claims can determine the presence of L-mono in 48 hours “with 98 percent accuracy.” (The Vidas 30 system is also said to detect the presence of salmonella, E. coli and campylobacter.) The first case involved a raw milk dairy in Butler County, Pennsylvania. According to the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA), the milk tested positive for L-mono on April 13 and sales of the milk were banned. The PDA issued a press release, warning about the milk from the dairy, but nothing in the press release indicated that there was a positive test for L-mono. After three subsequent negative tests, sales were reinstated at the farm. PDA did not issue a press release after reinstatement of sales. The second case involved a farm in Berks County, Pennsylvania. The statewide PDA press release stated that milk tested positive for L-mono on May 10. According to the farmer, PDA claimed the 48-hour test results showed the milk was positive for L-mono. Subsequently, the agency reversed its position and concluded that the milk was negative for L-mono. PDA took a second sample of milk from the farm on May 17, which also tested negative, and sales were reinstated on May 24. At the request of the farmers, PDA issued a press release stating that the milk from the farm had tested negative for L-mono, but sent it only to a local television station. A third case involved a farm in Lebanon, Pennsylvania. The PDA press release stated that milk from the farm tested positive for listeria on June 1. PDA told the farmer that the preliminary test showed the milk was positive for L-mono. Final test results indicated that it was positive as well. The farmer sent a milk sample from a different batch to an independent laboratory, Mosely Lab of Indianapolis, and the test results were negative for L-mono. Subsequently, PDA took a second sample of milk and that sample was negative for L-mono. The farmer took a sample from the same batch, sent it to Mosely Lab, and that sample also tested negative for L-mono. Even though PDA usually requires three negative tests from its own laboratories to let a farm resume sales, it evidently accepted the results from Mosely and required no further tests for L-mono. The second sample PDA took showed that the milk had a high coliform count, and when a follow-up sample showed that the coliform count was at an acceptable level, the state permitted sales to resume on June 13. A fourth case involves a farm in Clarion County, Pennsylvania. The PDA
press release stated that the milk from the farm tested positive for listeria
on June 14. PDA contacted the farmer on June 15 to tell him that his milk
had tested positive for L-mono. On June 20 the farmer sent a
sample of milk to Biotech Labs in New Castle; and, even though the milk
tested positive for listeria, final tests results showed that it was negative
for the L-mono strain. On June 26, the farmer sent two samples of milk
to Mosely Lab and a week later the test results came back negative for
L-mono. PDA is supposed to be running another test for L-mono; but as
of this date, it has yet to take a sample so raw milk sales at the farm
have not resumed. PEOPLE TO CONTACT Honorable Edward G. Rendell Honorable Dennis C. Wolff Mr. Bill Chirdon Honorable David A. Paterson Patrick Hooker, Commissioner, Will Francis, Dairy Division Director |
|||
|
A Campaign for Real Milk is a project of The
Weston A. Price Foundation |