Real Milk in Australia
March 31, 2002Real Milk Is Alive and Well in England
April 1, 2002
The table below was drawn up for a Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors vote on permitting raw milk in the County.
It is also available as a PDF.
|
RAW MILK—
with WARNING LABEL |
PASTEURIZED MILK—
NO WARNING LABEL |
OTHER FOODS—
NO WARNING LABEL |
| No outbreaks of human illness from consumption of raw milk in California. | 1997, 28 persons ill from Salmonella in California, ALL FROM PASTEURIZED MILK. | Massachusetts, June 1996, 38 persons ill and possibly contributing to one death from food contaminated with Salmonella served in a Wendy’s restaurant. |
| 1996, 46 persons ill from Campylobacter and Salmonella in California. | Idaho, September 1995, 11 people ill due to E. coli 0157:H7 traced to food eaten in a Chili’s restaurant in Boise. | |
| No outbreaks of human illness from consumption of raw milk in California. | 1994, 105 persons ill from E. coli and Listeria in California | Florida, August 1995, 850 people ill from Salmonella newport bacteria in chicken served at Margarita y Amigos restaurant in West Palm Beach. |
| March of 1985 19,660 confirmed cases of Salmonella typhimurium illness FROM CONSUMING PROPERLY PASTEURIZED MILK. Over 200,000 people ill from Salmonella typhimurium in PASTEURIZED MILK | Utah, January 1995, 96 people ill from hepatitis A traced to an employee of a Taco Bell restaurant in Salt Lake City | |
| No outbreaks of human illness from consumption of raw milk in California. | 1985, 142 cases and 47 deaths traced to PASTEURIZED Mexican-style cheese contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes. | Washington, DC, August 1994, 56 people ill and 20 hospitalized from Salmonella in Hollandaise sauce. |
| 1985, 1500 persons ill from Salmonella infection | Georgia, October 1993, one dead, 7 others ill from botulism in canned cheese sauce. | |
| No outbreaks of human illness from consumption of raw milk in California. | August of 1984 approximately 200 persons became ill with a Salmonella typhimurium from CONSUMING PASTEURIZED MILK | Illinois, June 1993, 41 people ill, 25 hospitalized from Salmonella in food served at a Mexican restaurant. |
| November of 1984, another outbreak of Salmonella typhimurium illness from CONSUMING PASTEURIZED MILK | Oregon, March 1993, 48 people ill from E. coli 0157:H7 in mayonnaise served at Sizzler restaurant. | |
| No outbreaks of human illness from consumption of raw milk in California. | 1983, over 49 persons with Listeria illness have been associated with the consumption of PASTEURIZED MILK in Massachusetts. | An additional 50 cases of illness caused by E. coli 0157:H7 bacteria in food served in Sizzler’s restaurants in Oregon and Washington were reported to CDC in 1993. |
| 1993, 28 persons ill from Salmonella infection | The western US, December 1992 to January 1993, 700 people ill from E. coli 0157:H7 in hamburgers served at Jack-in-the-Box restaurants in Washington, Idaho, Nevada and California. Nearly 100 of the victims developed hemolytic uremic syndrome, a serious complication resulting from E. coli 0157:H7 infection, and four children died. | |
| No outbreaks of human illness from consumption of raw milk in California | 1982, 172 persons ill (100 hospitalized) from a three Southern state area from PASTEURIZED MILK. | |
| 1982, over 17,000 persons became ill with Yersinia enterocolitica from PASTEURIZED MILK bottled in Memphis, Tennessee. |
This article appeared in the Fall 2001 edition of Wise Traditions, the quarterly journal of the Weston A. Price Foundation.
4 Comments
As a kid my cousins and I worked on a dairy farm. After the morning milking the farmer would give us a big glass of milk right out of the holding tank. Never had anyproblems, never got sick. just thought I would bring this up.
What is your response to this paragraph from the above link to the CDC study? My husband and I are in a debate about raw milk and giving it to our children. I continue to drink it but he refuses and won’t allow giving it to our kids. So we are in a battle of statistics and facts (which are had to come by and be easily understood)…..
Proportionately more persons were hospitalized
during outbreaks caused by nonpasteurized (13%) than by pasteurized dairy products (1%). This observation suggests that infections associated with nonpasteurized dairy products might be more severe, and it is consistent with the more frequent identifi cation of bacterial, rather than viral or toxic, causative agents and with the larger proportion of illnesses affecting children…
Here is a response from Ted Beals: Concerning the higher number and resulting % of hospitalizations with raw milk. Looking at the Table on page 387 you can see that the data is impacted by the “2,098” illnesses for fluid pasteurized milk. And a remarkably low number of hospitalizations with that 2,098 illness. This is the result of the fact that there was one significant outbreak of pasteurized milk in a prison system and there was an obvious incentive to not hospitalize prisoners. I am unaware of any data that raw milk drinkers who had an illness that was attributed to drinking raw milk would be more likely to be hospitalized. Or that becoming ill from drinking pasteurized milk resulted in less severe illness. You make the point about not including the deaths that occurred in the following year resulting from drinking pasteurized milk. The observation that their data suggests that there are more children ill when the outbreak is attributed to raw milk is again a reflection of that large prison outbreak which obviously did not include children.
This probably isn’t too much help, but my grandfather used to milk a cow for decades and drank the raw milk everyday and and far as i know never got ill from it. My mother wanted the cow tested for TB at one stage and it was found to be free of it. This was in Nelson, NZ. I have just started drinking raw milk myself at age 67.